Michele Ribecai vs Nikita Bilozertsev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• What about second serve performance? In the last six months, Ribecai has a slight edge, winning 42.83% of points compared to Bilozertsev’s 38.33%.
• When it comes to returning serves, both players have similar success. However, Ribecai is slightly ahead, winning 45.06% of opponents' second serve points against Bilozertsev's 44.73%.
• On first serve returns, Ribecai again has the upper hand with 29.64% compared to Bilozertsev’s 28.95%.
• How do they perform under pressure? Bilozertsev is ever so slightly better at saving break points with a 50% save rate versus Ribecai's 48.92%.
• Looking at overall match performance, Bilozertsev has won 63.64% of matches over the past year, while Ribecai has won 60.56% of theirs.
• Interestingly, their best surfaces are different. Bilozertsev excels on clay, with a win rate of 65%, whereas Ribecai shines on indoor hard courts with a 75% win rate.
• How challenging are their opponents? Bilozertsev has faced players with an average rank of 350.91, while Ribecai has taken on slightly higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 299.77.
• In the crucial moments of deciding sets, Bilozertsev has a stronger record, winning 50% of these sets as opposed to Ribecai's 31%.
• For break point opportunities, Bilozertsev has a better conversion rate at 36.73%, while Ribecai stands at 33.69%.

Editorial Prediction (August 7, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent performances, Ribecai has shown stronger second serve statistics, winning a slightly higher percentage of points, which often plays a crucial role in match outcomes.

When assessing return games, Ribecai edges out Bilozertsev in both first and second serve returns, indicating a marginally superior ability to pressure opponents.

Bilozertsev, however, excels in high-pressure scenarios by saving a larger percentage of break points, which could prove decisive in tight moments during the match.

Both players have unique strengths on different surfaces, which may influence the outcome if surface conditions are unfavorable to Bilozertsev's preference for clay or Ribecai's preference for indoor hard surfaces.

Given Ribecai’s advantage in return games and overall stronger competition faced, along with Bilozertsev's knack for high-pressure play, the match will likely be highly competitive. Ultimately, Ribecai's marginally more consistent performance metrics suggest they might emerge victorious. Predicted winner: Ribecai.